We developed a custom approach to SIA using our socioeconomic net outcome model to explore the balance between positive and negative effects, trade-offs, and offsets. We utilise this approach in collaboration with Indigenous groups, key stakeholders, and other project-affected individuals/groups.
We offer multiple services over a project's lifecycle focussed on our Socioeconomic Net Outcome Model
We focus on building strong, positive relationships on foundations of trust and understanding to collaboratively identify valued socioeconomic components through our Socioeconomic Net Outcome Model
Our team has developed a unique approach to socioeconomic assessments where we develop our own custom case studies or utilize existing case studies as primary sources of context or evidence for assessing project effects. We have developed five distinct styles of case studies to enhance understanding, conduct evidence-based analysis, and drive more informed decision-making.
Context case studies examine key elements of a project's development to determine if critical information exists that may affect how the project is developed or what to consider for future socioeconomic impact assessments. Examples include:
Effects case studies examine similar projects or areas where known or likely effects have already occurred. This provides valuable evidence that the team is aware of the project's effects, why effects will occur or can be avoided, how they will be managed, and any reductive (negative effects) or enhancement (positive effects) measures are to be employed. Examples include:
Comparator case studies look at analogous communities, regions, or other locales to identify areas with sufficiently similar characteristics but lacking in the changes from project effects to track generic or natural changes. This is particularly important when introducing a completely new industry to an area (i.e., greenfield), because it allows for non-project changes outside the area to be identified and thus separated from project-induced changes in the project area. This is an extremely useful tool when tracking project or cumulative effects, as well as management, mitigation, and monitoring of effects over time. Comparator case studies can also examine other industries to determine lessons learned, overlap, or dual use. Examples include:
Opportunity case studies examine potential opportunities for the project or proponent outside the effects assessment parameters to enhance the project in pursuit of net positive outcomes, where possible. Examples of opportunity case studies are:
Future decision case studies look at key project aspects in more detail to develop potential scenarios to better inform decision-makers. Examples include:
The set of characteristics that enable a group to function as a unit; generally social norms, cultural norms, and governance.
The changes in community structure or composition over time; or how individuals and groups within a community interact.
The capacity to cope with a change or stimulus. The opposite of resilience is vulnerability.
The willingness to modify behaviours or approaches to manage the effects of a change or stimulus.
Related or relatable values, variables, or indices that provide meaningful (i.e., measurable) information to assess performance.
Maintaining or producing outcomes that, over time and with the proper guidance, endure on their own without ongoing support.